Science exchange logo white
  • Solutions
      Buyers

      We are making R&D services readily available to every organization that seeks to make scientific impact. Learn More

      Providers

      We are changing the way providers access and engage customers to streamline the sale and delivery of R&D services. Learn More

      Industries Agriscience Animal Health Basic Research Biopharmaceutical Chemicals Consumer Health Food Science Medical Devices
      Reproducibility

      We believe that good experiments can and should be independently replicated and validated. Learn More

  • Resources
    Innovation Blog
    Customer Stories
    Events
    Industry Trends
    News
    Product Updates
    Help Center
  • About
    About
    Our Story
    Leadership
    Partners
    Join the Team
  • Contact
  • Log In Sign Up
  • Get a Demo
  • Between-person comparison of metabolite fitting for NMR-based quantitative metabolomics.

    Anal Chem. 83(22):8683-7. doi: 10.1021/ac202123k. November 15, 2011. View on PubMed.
  • Authors

    Volker Behrends (Biomolecular Medicine), Tredwell GD, Geier FM, Liebeke M, and Bundy JG
  • Abstract

    Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is widely used as an analytical platform for metabolomics. Many studies make use of 1D spectra, which have the advantages of relative simplicity and rapid acquisition times. The spectral data can then be analyzed either with a chemometric workflow or by an initial deconvolution or fitting step to generate a list of identified metabolites and associated sample concentrations. Various software tools exist to simplify the fitting process, but at least for 1D spectra, this still requires a degree of skilled operator input. It is of critical importance that we know how much person-to-person variability affects the results, in order to be able to judge between different studies. Here we tested a commercially available software package (Chenomx' NMR Suite) for fitting metabolites to a set of NMR spectra of yeast extracts and compared the output of five different people for both metabolite identification and quantitation. An initial comparison showed good agreement for a restricted set of common metabolites with characteristic well-resolved resonances but wide divergence in the overall identities and number of compounds fitted; refitting according to an agreed set of metabolites and spectral processing approach increased the total number of metabolites fitted but did not dramatically increase the quality of the metabolites that could be fitted without prior knowledge about peak identity. Hence, robust peak assignments are required in advance of manual deconvolution, when the widest range of metabolites is desired. However, very low concentration metabolites still had high coefficients of variation even with shared information on peak assignment. Overall, the effect of the person was less than the experimental group (in this case, sampling method) for almost all of the metabolites.

Science exchange logo white

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Solutions

  • Buyers
  • Providers
  • Reproducibility

Industries

  • Agriscience
  • Animal Health
  • Basic Research
  • Biopharmaceutical
  • Chemicals
  • Consumer Health
  • Food Science
  • Medical Devices

Resources

  • Innovation Blog
  • Customer Stories
  • Events
  • Industry Trends
  • News
  • Product Updates

About

  • Our Story
  • Leadership
  • Partners
  • Join the Team

Support

  • Contact Us
  • Help Center
  • Trust
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Science Exchange, Inc. All rights reserved.