Science exchange logo white
  • Solutions
      Buyers

      We are making R&D services readily available to every organization that seeks to make scientific impact. Learn More

      Providers

      We are changing the way providers access and engage customers to streamline the sale and delivery of R&D services. Learn More

      Industries Agriscience Animal Health Basic Research Biopharmaceutical Chemicals Consumer Health Food Science Medical Devices
      Reproducibility

      We believe that good experiments can and should be independently replicated and validated. Learn More

  • Resources
    Innovation Blog
    Customer Stories
    Events
    Industry Trends
    News
    Product Updates
    Help Center
  • About
    About
    Our Story
    Leadership
    Partners
    Join the Team
  • Contact
  • Log In Sign Up
  • Get a Demo
  • Intelligent, impedance-regulated, pulsed coagulation in a porcine renal artery model.

    Fertil Steril. 88(1):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.204. July 2007. View on PubMed.
  • Authors

    Marcus Menger, Wallwiener C, Wallwiener M, Neunhoeffer E, Isaacson K, and Zubke W
  • Abstract

    OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy of conventional pulsed coagulation (CPC) and newly developed intelligent, impedance-regulated, pulsed coagulation (IPC) in the sealing of porcine renal arteries.DESIGNProspective, randomized experimental study.SETTINGIsolated porcine artery model in an academic research environment.ANIMAL(S)Female Swabian Hall pigs.INTERVENTION(S)Renal arteries were harvested from Swabian pigs, flushed with saline, and sealed with bipolar open forceps by using high-frequency modulations of CPC (CPC-I: 800-ms pulse, 30-ms pause; CPC-II: 800-ms pulse, 300-ms pause) or IPC (self-regulation of the current flow to tissue impedance during thermal alteration). Additional vessels underwent multiple CPC. Burst pressure and seal failure were measured by increasing the pressure in the sealed arteries with saline infusion until rupture of the seal or the vessel wall.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)Mean burst pressure, number of instant and secondary seal failures, and relation of burst pressure to vessel diameter.RESULT(S)Mean burst pressure after IPC (585.5 +/- 56.8 mm Hg) was statistically significantly higher than that after CPC (CPC-I: 372.6 +/- 40.0 mm Hg; CPC-II: 334.2 +/- 44.2 mm Hg). Only 5.0% of the vessel seals after IPC, but 34.0% and 39.5% after CPC-I and CPC-II, showed instant or secondary seal failures, which also was a statistically significant difference. Seal quality after multiple CPC was comparable to that observed after the single IPC application (burst pressure, 597.3 +/- 60.1 [MCPC-I] mm Hg and 656.2 +/- 56.5 mm Hg [MCPC-II]; seal failure rate, 0).CONCLUSION(S)In an isolated porcine renal artery model, self-regulating modulation of energy-based vessel coagulation achieved superior thermal fusion of vascular tissue than did CPC. This promising novel technique should be analyzed further to determine its in vivo efficacy in long-term studies.

Science exchange logo white

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Solutions

  • Buyers
  • Providers
  • Reproducibility

Industries

  • Agriscience
  • Animal Health
  • Basic Research
  • Biopharmaceutical
  • Chemicals
  • Consumer Health
  • Food Science
  • Medical Devices

Resources

  • Innovation Blog
  • Customer Stories
  • Events
  • Industry Trends
  • News
  • Product Updates

About

  • Our Story
  • Leadership
  • Partners
  • Join the Team

Support

  • Contact Us
  • Help Center
  • Trust
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Science Exchange, Inc. All rights reserved.